Marantz vs denon reddit. Arcam would also give better room correction (Dirac).

Good rule of thumb is if a company doesn't mention an included feature in their marketing, it's probably not great. 2-channel AV receiver that comes packed with robust features for both audiophiles and cinephiles. Told them I was after a Denon 3800H asked if they could order the factory refurbished version for me. Or check it out in the app stores Marantz Cinema 50 vs Denon X3800H Purchasing US Is the Cinema 50 I have been using the Marantz to power my Definitive Technology BP 7004's, CS9040, SR8040's, D7's and Super Cube III sub. I'm in the beginning stages of my theater build (just starting to put walls up in the basement) and am wondering which receiver I should potentially… Former Denon owner, have the Cinema 50. Denon and Marantz are mostly the same. They are virtually identical — Denon/Marantz is the same company — just the X8500H is the receiver version with 13 built in amp channels whereas the Marantz is the pre-amp/processor version that requires 100% external amplification but has balanced outputs and inputs for higher end setups. 1 setup running off a tcl 75r635. that's great upgrade dilema to have. The contractor just informed me he can get me the Marantz SR8015 for $2,000. The Yamaha I can score for about AU$700 whereas the Denon is about AU$800, depending where you get them. Both are compatible with the MultEQ app. Explained that I was trying to buy local instead of online. I have both the Onkyo C7030 and Cambridge Audio AXC35 and both are great. Marantz is 99% a Denon in a different housing, near identical components for the most part. I've been reading a fair bit about AVRs lately and I know the general consensus around home theatre buffs is Denon/Marantz for the more budget friendly options or Anthem/Arcam/NAD for the slightly better options. They indicated that the Denon was "department store quality" and tried to upsell me on the Marantz Cinema 50 for Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now (Marantz MCR612, Denon RCD-N11, Onkyo CS-N755) Need Help Choosing Amplifier for Elac Debut b5. 4 setup, which might be upgraded to a 7. 9% of the time Soundbars or HTiB (Home Theater in a Box) systems are not a good investment of your time and money. 1 AVR which doesn't support 4k video. I’d rather save $800 if it’s an apples to apples comparison. Also you probably should know that Audyssey implementations below Audyssey MultEQ XT32 aren’t really that good. Arcam would also give better room correction (Dirac). 1 compatibility. The Denon 4200 series is a killer amp, it really depends on your plans for expansion, the 4200 gives you more options, if you want the HEOS Integration I believe it started with the x300 branded denon which is one gen ahead of the 4200. Does this have any impact? the Marantz has lower power, will it still be able to properly drive my speakers? Looking to upgrade my current Marantz SR5011, and the above two models are on my radar. I own a marantz PM-8006 (and while this marantz has a satisfying sense of open-ness and "air" and detail to the sound, including believable-sounding tonality when it comes to acoustic instruments) it does sound just a bit too "polite" and recessed for my tastes. Easiest way to see the power loss with the Marantz is that it has a power consumption of 250w compared to 430w on the Denon. The only reason I chose the Marantz 6 series over the Denon 3 series was I was still using a player with a multichannel analog output so I needed an AVR with multichannel analog inputs. 4 setup, don't need Uber loud, only use for movies, sports and no gaming. The Denon’s amplifier is pretty close in power. I have the Marantz SR-7008, I love the understated styling. The Denon has no Front Pre Outs, so need to move up a notch and spend a bit more. The specs of these both tick the boxes for me, so I'm looking for some input from those who own either AVR. Just a thought because I can't stand mismatched components myself. 1 anymore (split it into a second zone). The receiver I had my eye on for now was the Denon AVR-S650H, but I have found a second hand Marantz NR1506 near me for a good price. No other devices. Trying to decide between the 2 which way to go. The idea of having a Marantz brand receiver is also a little attractive from a prestige standpoint, but if the Denon is a better buy, I will lean that direction instead. These two are so close I'd say go with the one that you like best. They are the same company, not gonna split their R&D and manufacturing departments in half. Marantz Cinema 40 vs Denon X4800H Specs at a Glance: View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. I currently have an Onkyo 5010 power amp for my two mains, so essentially the Denon is driving 9 channels, without any obvious struggles for my standards (we like to watch movies at ~75db, maybe 80 at peaks). My current setup is a Denon AVR X550BT which drives stereo Monitor Audio Bronze 2 speakers and a Wharfedale SW150 sub. This is also why Marantz is rated lower than Denon in ASR measurements. The price of the DENON is the most economical. Get support, learn new information, and hang out in I've been eyeing up a Denon X3500H for a while. Marantz is really just a marked up Denon, made by the same company. Now as the title states, I have a choice between the Denon AVC-X4700H and the Marantz SR7015 for the receiver, and the Emotiva XPA-7 and the Marantz MM8077 for the amp. The Marantz also has more features than the Denon. I don't want another entry level receiver so i have been looking at the following receivers: Marantz SR6015 ($1615) Denon AVC-X4700H ($1850) NAD T758 V3I ($1770) Theses three are the only ones in stock in my country. I was blown away with how the R3s sounded with a Arcam AVR10 vs Any of the offerings from Marantz and and Denon in the $1,000-$2,000 range; even the Marantz SR6014. Not familiar with the Yamaha though. We found that each offers remarkable performance, with distinctive characteristics that will appeal to different users. Denon is know for their cheap receivers. Read that it supports Dolby vision, HDR10 and atmos, plus has support for 4K @120 and VRR support. 99. Mostly in the $1,000-$2,000 USD range. Am I getting a better deal with going with the cheaper Denon with higher power? I’ve been thrown a lot of x4400/4500 vs Marantz 6012 thoughts. May 20, 2023 · Over a thorough period of real-world usage and rigorous hands-on testing, we meticulously explored every feature of both the Marantz Cinema 40 and Denon X4800H AV receivers. I've loved both Yamaha and Denon for a long time. Some say go Denon, the extra power will be nice (if unnecessary) to make the Klipsch sing. At least when I see them brought up. I have a Marantz SR-7008 that I liked very much but ended up selling with the boss purchased a new stand that didn't allow enough airflow over the receiver. 2 setup. Their warranty statement is worthless so plan accordingly. Basically, with Marantz you pay a little extra for the name. And, denon has the better version of audysey. Some swear the Marantz has a "warmer" sound while the Denon has more cold, metallic sound whatever that means. It is less than 1. Marantz might have a slight edge but I'm basing that on the fact that they really market those two features. I'm a marantz fan over denon based on my listening experience and afew friends whose opinions i trust. Truth is, other than more channels, some upgraded streaming stuff, HDMI video upgrades, I don't see much difference from my 5 year old Denon X4100W and my Denon S720W. Regarding AV Receivers i prefer Marantz before Denon because Marantz are more "calibrated" towards Music and Denon are more "calibrated" towards Homecinema. Marantz & Denon are the same Company. 1. That is bullshit. Seems to get great reviews, priced around $550 on Amazon currently. Can i remove the feet and have problem (heat?). The Marantz has a Hybrid PLL Clock Jitter Reducer and a Video Conversion function. The sales guy is trying to push me towards a Marantz SR5014 priced around $1k. . Jul 23, 2021 · The reliable, objective testing I’ve seen on Denon and Marantz receivers is on audio science review where they conclude that most Marantz receivers are utter cack and most Denon receivers are very good. So the general consensus is Denon/Marantz over Pio Elite now that it's basically a piano-black Onkyo. Both the Denon and marantz have better room correction than the Yamaha. I have been considering "upgrading" to a Marantz NR1200 for my receiver, my thinking being that a unit designed for stereo 2. The reliability rates drove me to Denon, streaming high res music is practically indistinguishable between the two brands is my guess. I've had my Yamaha RX-A2020 for a long time and love the amp but just upgraded to a Denon x4700h for the new features. I think marantz builds beautiful amps and even the remote is nice, but the silver models from denon are also looking very nice. I found a Marantz SR-50L stereo reciver for a very good price at my local thrift shop. My setup: 5. Denon X3600H. 00 CDN. 2 pre-outs is also attractive to me, but I'll forgo that if the Marantz has significantly better DACs. Given that Marantz and Denon are also close in objective performance, with Denon usually winning slightly, it makes no sense to pay $1000 extra for the same hardware. Reply reply npielert Marantz 6013 vs. ) that is inspected The Marantz sounds better than the Denon to me. The Marantz seems to be far more powerful. You might want an avr for future ability to hook up via hdmi and those units are already lacking now. Then I can assign remaining internal amp channels to drive the rears. Denon AVR-S760H vs. However, I do blind comparisons between receivers, speakers, etc. Personally I'd go with the Marantz because I like their sound. Marantz cinema 70. Looking to setup a 5. Pricing has not been announced yet, but don't be surprised if it ends up costing an extra $400-500 on top of the price of the AVR. I've been given the green light to buy a receiver I have an opportunity to get a good deal on a used Marantz receiver, specifically, the SR6005, which was made in 2011 & retailed for $1000 at that time. Jul 9, 2020 · Denon AVRX4700H OR Marantz SR7015? Thanks! D. Marantz>Denon>Yamaha. Option 1 - Marantz The Marantz has 7 pre-outs which I can use to drive my Acurus 3x100 amp to drive the three fronts. Should I spend the extra 1k for the Marantz if it is that much better or is my best bet Denon 4700? The MRX540 can power 5 channels and process an additional 2. NEW: Marantz Cinema 40 goes for €1950 here (the Denon X4800H is currently €1900, so not much cheaper atm) USED: Denon X6700H would be €1200 I'm mostly aware of the technical difference, with the exception of: The Denon DRA800 is rated at :100 W + 100 W (8 Ω/ohms)120 W + 120 W (6 Ω/ohms) The Marantz PM7000N is rated at :60 W x 2 (8 Ω/ohms load)80 W x 2 (4 Ω/ohms load) So on paper the Denon is far more powerful. Marantz is known for sound quality. I am in a smaller apartment, so I won't need a ton of power. Marantz adds op-amps into the signal path they call HDAM which degrades SINAD and they’ve used extremely slow roll-off reconstruction filters in their DACs which introduce ultrasonic aliasing into the signal. Marantz nr1510(399$) VS DENON avr s650h(388$) I am basically hesitating between these 2 systems, the Marantz is on sale for 399 instead of 649$ but I don't know if it's worth it. No. While I know this isn't comparing apples to apples I originally decided on the Denon X1700H and have a pre-order through Crutchfield (I can cancel) that probably won't get in for at least another month and I'm open to upping the budget to just over $1,000 if worth it. ) I suppose sound and interface are the most important. Denon vs Marantz. I think they both come out of the same factory in China. Also looking at the 777 for extra inputs, but seems like that’s the only gain as I don’t have 7. 1 port causing me an issue in the future. 1 is working. Now I have a Sony - the interface on this thing is just as garbage. You start with the exact same design and max out the features for Denon and for Marantz you strip out some of the features but add a few minor design changes and use a little better quality of components in some places. Im looking to upgrade my current setup a bit from my dads old Denon PMA 720. You can get the Denon for $630. I also used the Audyssey phone app which was $20 and it seemed to improve things. Marantz If you want big power and awesome processing, I'd do the Anthem AVM 70 8K processor, and stick with Emotiva for the amps. Also the Yamaha A-S501 through 801, though I don’t know what Yamaha prices are like in Europe. I’ve heard Marantz is higher quality to Denon and maybe that’s why the Marantz is a higher cost than the Denon. Onkyo has been hit and miss. As per audiosciencereview's marantz sr6014 review, denon avr-x3600h was better on tests. The Marantz was recommended by a Best Buy theatre designer. I signed an agreement saying I would return the Marantz, but I was waiting on some Def Tech speakers but they were out of stock. Will end up with a 7. Great Intergrated with more power then the other 2 listed. 1 system made of quality, Audio-Centric name brand components which are easy to assemble and cheap enough for low budget or space conscious buyers. The Marantz is actually deeper, which can make it more problematic to fit in certain media cabinets. Denon X3800 would be better than the Marantz IMO (and cheaper), since it gives you Audyssey XT32/Dirac upgradability. Denon X3700H The (un)official home of #teampixel and the #madebygoogle lineup on Reddit. Aug 22, 2023 · This considerable difference in cost, coupled with the Denon’s formidable array of capabilities, makes it difficult to justify the additional expenditure for the Marantz. 1 system with a CX and series X. Also the marantz has . Denon AVR-X1700H Marantz NR1711 Denon 1700 seems a better choice based on the few forum suggestions I have read, and I really like the form factor of the NR1711 which easily can fit in my existing console stand and provides space for ventilation. 0 HT I could and now I am looking for minor upgrades that are kind of important to me. No direct experience with the X3800H but I watch movies and listen to a lot of high end recordings (24/96 FLAC, etc) with the C50 driving 4 KEF R3s and it sounds amazing. for upstairs system and it was night and day on quality. Many of the new Marantz units are virtually the same as Denon models, in my eyes. Denon x4300h and marantz p15m owner here. My Denon broke after 4 years, the repair centre said they couldn't source the HDMI daughterboard, what a pile. 1 speakers. I have a 7. Edits: Found reasons to choose DENON X3800H over ONKYO TX-RZ50 based on comments below: The subwoofer outputs is dedicated in the DENON, which is better for my set up. Marantz (as a brand) seem to be more aimed at music than movies, and since music is my priority, that seems like a good argument for the Marantz. I like the front porthole design better but it's not exactly user friendly. 2 Jamo S809 HCS + S 8 overheads (8 ohm). Asking because the denon (and maybe the marantz too since I didn’t look it up) doesn’t have hdmi inputs. There are differences in internal electronics and the Marantz has 11 channel pre outs. I'm aware that for music marantz is better while for home theatre its denon. The Cinema 70S doesn't even offer a better version of Audyssey than the S760H. That Marantz your essentially double dipping on paying extra for things that don't improve sound. And it's high up enough in their product line that it's made in japan. Going from this, the Denon is better, especially as it has Audyssey MultiEQ XT32, vs Audyssey MultiEQ XT of the Marantz. 1 setup (Paradigm Atom v6 bookshelf speakers, CC-190 center, and DSP 3100 sub) with a Marantz SR6004 receiver. The Denon AVR-X6700H and Marantz SR7015 are within $100 of each other and I was wondering if anyone had thoughts about these two receivers? Currently have Klipsch Reference Speakers; but looking to also upgrade those at some point to the Reference Premiere Speakers. Denon AVR-x3600H vs Onkyo RZ-740. I am going to use them with a 5. Realistically, you won’t hear much of a difference but the Marantz is technically more powerful. DrJayDub Member. I’ll start this thread if we could add some estimates, news and / or rumors for folks after 7. View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. 4 higher end amplifiers. 4 soon. Denon models measure better. Denon AVR-X2800H or Marantz CINEMA 70s ? Purchasing EUROPE I Need help choosing between these receivers, I listen to music, play my ps5 and watch movies, my bed room is small so ideally I do not need a high wattage receiver and I don’t really know the pros or cons of each ,although the Marantz includes pre out channels. 1 for the Denon Marantz does 4K upscaling and analog to HDMI upconversion for composite video. Paying for Marantz name and smaller form factor. The differences I have found are that: the Marantz has a 24 bit DAC against Denon's 32 bit DAC. The Denon is so much money. Or check it out in the app stores     TOPICS Marantz M-CR 611 vs Denon RCD-M41DAB Owning both a Marantz SR6011 and now the X3800h, save his money and get the Denon. 2 The 800h and Marantz NR1200 (its pricier cousin) send full-range to the main 2 speakers at all times, even if the sub output is turned on. People on here might downvote me for saying that because they are really into measurements and such. Functionally they are identical other than that. Looking to replace my 5. AVR-X2800H lacks the preamplifier outputs of the X3x00H series, and it also has the inferior Audyssey MultEQ XT (vs. But they've also had some problems. You guys have any advice, my room is about 24m2 (250sqfeet), for a stereo system(for now) with about 4 HDMI devices and I want to have a system with wifi and 4k pass The differences, from what I have found, is that the Denon is a bit more powerful (75 W vs 50 W), and it has hdmi 2. They have some good models and a lot of people love them. Both are relatively new and have a similar feature set. They also focus less on detail and clarity with priority toward the low end, taming any harshness. We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. 1 sound will be more suitable than my current receiver which is setup for 5. 1 implementation. Suits acoustic music and female voices very well, good soundstage and depth. If the original artist wanted more distortion in their work, they would have added more distortion. Eyeing the denon avr-1600h and the yamaha rx-v6a. 1 multichannel pre outs. They are 85% identical. Denon S760h seems like an obvious choice at $450 from Costco but the S660h at $500 also seems like a good option but seems to be lacking features like DTS:X and Dolby Atmos. It also has pre-outs for front channels. I was told they only sell the Marantz line instead of the Denon stuff. Arcam is considered premium, Denon/Marantz middle of the road but almost always trouble free. 5 inches taller than the Marantz Cinema 70S. The Marantz has a few sound oriented features the Denon does not (like HDAM buffers for the pre-amp) that theoretically makes it better for music. To illustrate the difference in soundstage between Marantz and Denon, let’s use a movie scene example, such as a gunfight scene in "John Wick". Related Comparisons: Denon AVR-X4800H vs Marantz Cinema 50; Denon AVR-X4800H vs Yamaha RX-A6A Aventage Comparison; Denon AVR-X4800H vs. 4. While I have been reading up reviews and comparing the two, I am still at a bit of a loss with regards to which one I should get. I can say that the Denon 600NE is a great amp, it has Bluetooth, a proper headphone jack and a phono stage but it's by no means neutral sounding. Audussey MultEQ XT32 in the X3x00H series). 2 system, with the possibility to expand to 5. Or check it out in the app stores     TOPICS Marantz Cinema 50 vs Denon 3800 . I then purchased a Denon ignoring the evil stare from the Mrs. What's the recommendation on a Denon model? Almost exclusively for movies/TVnot much music. What would you recommend? I'm interested in buying a new receiver now that HDMI 2. Today’s receivers sound remarkably similar to this structure. I was given a Denon AVR-X1600His this a better unit for (mostly ) home theater use? Music use on this system is mostly just background, I have a separate old school analog setup for vinyl playback. 2. Or check it out in the app stores   Marantz SR6015 vs Denon AVC-X4700H vs NAD T758 V3I I’ve loved the way my Pioneer sounds and the way my Denon sound but the Pioneer is 50 years old now and the Denon is a few years old and one of their low end models so it’s hard to get a good judgement on the ones I’m looking at. A friend said most of my base needs (Movies, streaming music, videos games) would best be met with the Denon, but the Marantz would be far superior with my vinyl records, but I just feel like the Marantz will sound better. As for the sound, I personally preferred the marantz but not by much. So if you buy an amp for those two extra channels, you cannot assign the internal amps to the atmos speakers, you must use the internal amps to the F and L channels or get an amp with additional channels. However, you will have the option of independently tuning up to four subwoofers using DIRAC with this AVR. Also missing is amp matrix. Marantz, as far as I’m aware, is just the Denon with a facelift. Best I can glean is that Denon is kind of like Marantz lite. But might also look into either the Yamaha A-701 or A-S501. Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. I have the opportunity to get a new NR1510 for $375, and I know Marantz is a well known brand that is good for music. My 2 current options are the Denon 3800 plus the emotiva BasX 3 for $2100 total (this is what I am leaning towards) Or the Marantz SR8015 Japan made for $2,800. 2 system, I rarely play surround music and just use my towers and a sub and I listen to a lot of music. Time to upgrade an older 5 channel pioneer receiver. Denon will allow a much better entry point in an amp than Rotel. I love that the denon knows exactly what you've hooked up. Finally, between Marantz and Denon the book says Marantz is better for music, Denon for HT. In short the two are very close indeed. Today I heard the KEF R3’s and the KEF R2C. Soundstage Comparison: Marantz vs. I also read somewhere that Marantz is $500 more for the same thing, just because it’s their higher end model. If you're more into a mix between movie and music but mostly movies the X6400 would be a better choice as it also has a bit better mains amps and is more featured/geared towards home theater over 2 channel audio. I don't think Marantz is the same company they used to be in terms of quality. Yamaha has very poor hdmi 2. Currently the Denons have better room correction which usually puts them in the lead over Yamahas. The Marantz CINEMA 70s has even less performant room correction system In the end, denon and marantz are using the same parts in their products and it’s all about optical preferences. When comparing Denon vs. Can still return the Denon but wondering if anyone can comment on Yamaha sound quality vs Denon/Marantz. Denon’s are usually better measuring devices compared to Marantz. It's warmer, the denon is bright and a bit livlier. This type of thing is definitely out of my budget (maybe and I mean MAYBE in the future but not for at least 5 years or so). Marantz sound quality, the differences come pre-and post-merger for the brands. I've also seen that the Denon S760H ($500) is a great option for an entry-level AVR. Same Price. PS5 and shield auto labeled. they are both made by the same company and the phono input on the Denon works with either MM or MC phono cartridge . I feel my current receiver isn't driving my KEF Q100/Q200 setup as well as it could. Marantz SR6013 vs. Main reason: slim design, it can easly fit my cabinets + it looks future proof (if i upgrade to a short trow at some time in the future i can still us it!) Denon x2800: Main reason not: It cannot fit my cabinet : its only 162mm high. I currently have a Denon 591. But Denon AVR-X3800H wouldn’t be too bad either. Am I missing something with regard to denon vs marantz? Denon and Marantz are owned by the same company and their receivers are quite similar in function. Or check it out in the app stores Marantz sr5010 vs Denon str-x1700h . I think there are more image differences than technical advantages? The owner company is the same in the last decade. I'm a noob at this stuff so I am a little concerned about getting a receiver that is over 3 years old and being replaced (which is why the price dropped so much). Welp how about timing. I would assume the Marantz is similar in terms of muscular beefy sound so I'd advise against them given the preferences. I will be splitting the system equally between movies, gaming, and music/turntable. Much better than Audyssey XT on the Marantz. What I'm most concerned with is the difference in audio. Joined Jun 25, 2020 Messages 20 Facebook Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email Share Link. Richer Sounds (UK) has both Marantz NR1510 and Denon SR660H at £499. However it seems there absolutely no news about cinema 30 (or denon avr-6800h - avr-6700h successor). This remains about the only significant reason to choose the Marantz 6 series over the Denon cousin. Deciding between these 2 receivers and open to other options. The Denon is more detailed, a little brighter and is capable of a very good soundstage. 2 ch and has pre out which could make it 9. As per general consensus, denon is better for movies & marantz is better for music. So the Marantz SR 5015 is a 7. Keep in mind that the Denon S760H is much cheaper, supplies more power, and is barely any larger. For that reason most people recommend Denon. I seriously cannot decide but am leaning towards the Denon (My Onkyo blew up and my Pioneer Elite is flashing UE22, done with those. It looks like a great receiver for the money, and I'm not sure I need much more. Im trying to stay sub $1000 and the Denon pushes that a bit and since it was just released and might be hard to find for a bit but I can wait if its obviously the much better choice. I’m shopping ps5 ready receivers and ran across the marantz nr1711. After a phone call I was able to get an exception to the return window. The Marantz 7012 basically is the Denon X4400 with the proprietary Marantz HDAM analog circuit enhancements and multichannel analog inputs. Biggest difference is that the denon is 9. Does anybody know if its worth switching with my Denon? Thanks :) The original plan was the Denon 3800H with an Amp totalling about $1800. I think the Marantz line attempts to go for slimmer boxes and cleaner looking fronts. Denon and Marantz are the same company, Marantz is mainly just better in aesthetics and UI. 00 CDN at Best Buy. Marantz receivers are better for music-focused applications, and they’re more expensive on average. So its safe to assume, denon avr 2020 series will better than marantz. 2 ch receiver like Denon X3700H? The two other options that are available are the Denon S760H (€690, available next month) and the Marantz NR1711(€800, available now). Option 2 - Denon The Denon has assignable amps so I can bi-amp the R3s, single channel to the center, and surround backs. They are built like tanks and sound great. 0b. The marantz and Denon gets you a full bandwidth hdmi 2. Also similar feature set on Marantz is usually 1. In 2017, Sound United bought Boom, Polk Audio, Definitive Technology, Denon, and Marantz together under one umbrella. If you look at the amp specs or compare the back panels you will see the guts are literally identical other than the few extra Marantz enhancements which cater to their more “musical” brand cachet. Does yours support Dolby Vision pass through? if the $300 give or take for the Marantz is "worth it" compared to the Denon, as well as if Marantz/Denon is better as a whole than the much less expensive Yamaha, because on paper the Yamaha looks only slightly worse than the Denon, but comes in at a much easier to swallow cost. Purchasing EU Just found an Hi all, I'm enjoying my new Denon 4800 in a 7. The biggest advantage is the marantz has full 7. No offense but that’s like saying the only reason to get a Porsche over an economy car is because the Porsche looks better so why waste your money. My brother has always owned Denon and he’s always been happy with it. On the other hand the different between SR5008 and SR5010 is pretty big so it was worth the upgrade. Marantz SR6004 vs Denon 760H Discussion I've bought a used 3. I was told by a sales man over the phone from my local audio store that they dropped Denon receivers because of too many problems and terrible customer support. I can find the Cinema 70s and Denon X2800H at the same price, and Denon X1700H considerably cheaper. 1 Denon AVR-S650H. So, I'm back to my (fugly-looking) ugly duckling, 1973 "vintage" Sony receiver. Have you compared to the Denon/Marantz ones by chance? I have about a week left to return my Denon and I’m strongly considering the switch. 2 or a 7. Just compare the features. Denon and Marantz are the same company, both owned by Denon. But the Denon is 90W per channel vs 50W per channel on the Marantz. I do not see any comparison between these two in forums and youtube. x. Also, the specs I run a 5. Yamaha RX-V681 vs Denon AVR-S920W. End of the day, I'd say go denon just for the value alone. The NFM near me has all of the Onkyos set up alongside Marantz, a Denon or two, Yamaha, etc. and the Denon and Marantz units at NFM, Best Buy, and anywhere else were always very hot to the touch even at idle compared to the Onkyos and Yamahas that were barely above room temp. Denon. 2 channel I believe Also incorrect. Closer to the way the Pioneer sounds, too. So, I have selected the most interesting receivers of the two brands in different price segments, from entry-level to premium models, and I will compare them. It's a factory refurb (open box, display models, etc. So either a 5. 0 or 2. So I can get my hands on the Denon 4700 for $1,999. Marantz nr1606 vs Denon avr-3806 for powered studio monitors surround Tech Support So I built the cheapest quality 4. In theory either amp has more than enough power to drive the wall speakers, and both receivers should have enough power to drive the four ceiling speakers. Not to mention, it is much more aesthetically pleasing than the denon. As a possible alternative to the Marantz I would also look at the IOTAVX SA3 and the Denon PMA-800NE (same parent company as Marantz). Now the Marantz SR6015 fits my current needs but I'm worried about the single HDMI 2. Trying to decide between the two. It is the general consensus of r/hometheater not to recommend these things and instead simply steer a user toward a 2. So my trusty Denon AVR-X1300W died yesterday and i need a replacement quickly. But the actual experience is very different. The DENON would be my fallback if I can't get the the Marantz in silver color or if the ONKYO GUI does not work properly with my TV. I'm running an M&K 750 thx 7. They like to hype the best parts of their gear. I'm not aware of any which have a decent UX. Marantz is generally considered the more “musical” of the three mentioned and the Cinema 40 is no exception; I have one—it’s great! As far as gaming, all HDMI-IN ports on the Denon and Marantz are 2. It does look gorgeous, sounds fantastic and has tons of power. Audessy makes Denon/Marantz worth purchasing as long as you can get a good discount on the unit. 5 to 2 times more expensive than the equivalent Denon. Denon x2700h and sr5015 equivalent models for comparison of the Marantz tax. Problem is, they actually aren't compatible without with a board replacement or a manufacturer supplied dongle you have send away for (both solutions are free, though). Feb 18, 2024 · I’ll help you understand the intricacies of Marantz vs Denon. Plan to use it for games and movies mostly. IMO the higher end old Marantz receivers are superior to the new models. Denon has DTS Virtual:X and DTS Dialog Control, better Audyssey, Dolby Vision, For the Denon, you will need to pay for a DIRAC upgrade. I spoke to a local AV company about setups recently. regularly for fun, and last time out my top 2 brands were Marantz followed by Pioneer, with them being super neck and neck, and Hi Folks, have a new Denon AVRX2600H and need front Pre Outs for my new HK Amp to run my power hungry front JBLs. Personal preference. I have a 5. 1 port. I’d go with the Marantz. In theory the Marantz should sound better, in reality I can't tell the difference. Denon merged with Marantz in 2002. Offering 125 watts per channel and equipped with state-of-the-art discrete high-current power amplifiers, it promises to deliver a balanced, quality sound across a wide range of speakers. The only different is branding and price point. 1 sound, but want something decent with good Smart Home / Google integration (especially since Chromecast Audio is now a thing of the past). You could buy an AVM 70, Emotiva XPA-7 Gen3 to power 7 main channels, Emotiva BasX A6 to power 6 height channels, and it would still be less money than the Denon AVR-A1H. There's a problem with the HDMI 2. I only found out months after. 1 (upgrading from home theater in a box) There is only a $100 difference between the 2 units but I believe the 4800 is comparable (money wise) to a Marantz cinema 40. Sep 14, 2023 · The Marantz SR7015 is a high-performance 9. Stated rms watts for denon is 105 vs 100. The receivers are identical except for the port hole display (which isn't great if you actually like seeing any information), the HDAM circuit (which Marantz says makes stereo music better), and maybe slightly better components. ) Denon brings out a new model every year, but don't bother doing any improvement to the software. 2 vs 7. Not a huge difference between the 3 minus Auro3d in the Marantz and Onkyo where the Denon comes with it. It can be hard to compare the two as they're manufactured under a single label called Sound United. I wonder if Sound United, who acquired D+M Group, who owns Denon+Marantz - will ever just kill off either Denon or Marantz, because aside from maybe "market saturation", I struggle to see the point in the same company shipping products with so little difference between them. Compare the back of the Denon AVR-4500H against the Marantz SR6014: Neither? Marantz CINEMA 50 would be the better choice. Ive done some digging online about the model, but i have trouble finding information on it. I'll use the system for CDs and to connect turntable in relatively small room. Dec 7, 2020 · Marantz have a more laid back sound, warmer, very musical. In any case, let's have it: In general, Marantz is better for music while Denon is better for home theaters. Marantz NR1608 vs DenonX2400H The Denon has 2 hdmi outputs, the marantz only has one, but This subreddit is for the budget minded audiophile that wants to grow out of soundbars, boomboxes, mini systems, portable bluetooth, lifestyle speakers, and PC peripheral branded audio solutions. The Denon is about $500 cheaper being a display model, and it has plenty of channels (11). With that being said it is kind of steering me toward Marantz . Same with the Marantz. Only interested in 5. hello, I have to find the better all in one solution between Marantz M-CR 611 and Denon RCD-M41DAB. But realistically speaking, people make way too much of the Marantz filter/output stage/distortion/whatever you want to call it. Instrumental separation and placement is excellent. If budget permits, skip x2700h & go for x3700h. The Denon would portray rock Between those 2 I'd go with the Denon. Or check it out in the app stores Marantz nr1606 vs Denon avr-3806 for powered studio monitors surround The SR7012 is based on the Denon X4400H receiver but with the porthole display, HDAM in the pre amp section and multi channel analog inputs. I've read too much and am now lost in AV hell. Below is the chatgpt 4o answer. I’ve been looking at Marantz and Denon. Current sources: Marantz/Denon are obviously designing disposable units, so always buy open boxes. the addition of the Audyssey MultEQ XT32 room correction would be one of the upgrades i'd be most forward to having. I'm looking to purchase a stereo receiver with multiple HDMI inputs and would appreciate advice in helping choose between the Marantz Stereo 70S (75w/c) and Denon DRA 900H (100w/c). What are you thoughts on how this holds up to newer receivers? The other receiver I am considering is the recommended 5. 3. AVR (Note also that the fact that the Denon has full 7. My Onkyo TX-RZ50 order is finally ready just a day after my return window on my Marantz SR6015 expires. Oct 31, 2023 · Denon is a better pick for home theaters due to its slightly better performance over Marantz for that purpose, and overall lower cost than Marantz. The musical ‘tuning’ is simply adding in distortion and ruining a perfectly good Denon. Nov 30, 2023 · Denon and Marantz are known for delivering high-fidelity professional and consumer-grade audio equipment, especially AV receivers. 1 instead of 2. I want to know how different will be the sound quality and dolby atmos be from getting a dedicated 9. As far as R&D goes, Marantz makes preamps and power amp as well as integrated so the whole focus is on sound quality where as Denon mostly makes receivers which is where their R&D goes. The big thing you lose is individually configurable sub outs, so if you have different subs and don’t want to get a miniDSP (which you probably should anyway if you have different subs) the Denon could pull ahead. The extra channels doesn’t matter much but on the looks of it, that seems like a decent upgrade for the normal $100 difference. 1 boards on Yamaha, Denon, and Marantz receivers that boast 2. For one, it has a slightly better amplifier. Driving two channel easy enough for the better AVR’s. 4 sub capability vs . If they are all pretty much equal in performance, I might be looking at the one which is likely to pair with my next amp. Forums The Denon has the Amp for the same price, which - even if you are using your own external amps - is a nice to have, especially if it is "free" compared to the Marantz - for instance maybe you can use some of the Denon's channels for peripheral speakers. Marantz 7015 will likely be $2,999. This is not the case for the Sony. The original receiver upstairs was Sony that blew a channel, the original theater receiver was an older Harmon Kardon that had more power vs the Onkyo but lacked new age features. In Canada, the Marantz is $1299 and the Denon is $999. What are your thoughts? Marantz SR6015 vs. My usage is 90% movies, 10% music. AVR-X6700H I'm gunning for the Marantz Cinema 40 (or Denon X4800H if it comes out way cheaper) but came across a used X6700H. Music is more difficult to reproduce than Home Cinema Surround - because of this i prefer Marantz. bzeg opf xex qbcgfpa powfgw gvaau gxlm qbodpqwn lfdhc vpzcla